Programme for Immunization Preventable Diseases - IPD
 
Basic Epidemiology of Poliomyelitis
Strategies for Polio Eradication
Polio Vaccine
Acute Flaccid Paralysis
Case Classification
Virological case classification system
AFP Surveillance
Case Investigation
Outbreak Response Immunization (ORI)
Virus Isolation & Specimen Collection and Transport Procedures
Surveillance Program Indicators
Data Analysis And Monitoring
Clinical Aspects of Paralytic Poliomyelitis
Differential diagnosis of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP)
Clinical Management of Poliomyelitis
 
ACUTE FLACCID PARALYSIS
 
AFP Surveillance for poliomyelitis eradication
 

Surveillance for Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) started in 1996 through Early Warning Reporting System (EWARS) and since mid June 1998 through the collaboration with Ministry of Health and WHO-Polio Eradication Nepal. Effective from September 2005, Polio Eradication Nepal (PEN) has changed its name to Programme for Immunization Preventable Diseases (IPD) due to expansion of its activities to wider surveillance and immunization areas. There are currently 10 surveillance field offices. All the surveillance and immunization activities are conducting in close coordination with MoH, Department of Health Services, Child Health Division including Regional Health Directorates, and the District Public Health Offices. For passive surveillance, 410 weekly zero reporting units (potential health facilities) are enrolled through out the country and for active surveillance 81 sites.

According to the TCG recommendation on 15 July 2005, Nepal has achieved the non-polio AFP rate of >2 per 100,000 under 15 years population and adequate stool specimen collection rate of >80% of AFP cases in 2005.There is no virological laboratory in Nepal; therefore specimens are sent to reference laboratory, Bangkok, Thailand every week, however, we do have laboratory for other VPDs surveillance. Nepal is conducting Measles, Neonatal Tetanus, and Japanese Encephalitis surveillance integrating with AFP surveillance. Surveillance for Haemophilus Influenza type B (HIB) has just added now.


Basic Epidemiology of Poliomyelitis

The poliovirus is an enterovirus comprising three serotypes: poliovirus type 1, 2 and 3. All three can cause paralysis, although type 1 causes paralysis most often, type 3 less frequently, and type 2 rarely. Most epidemics are due to type 1. Cases of paralysis associated with OPV are usually caused by types 3 and 2.The overall risk of vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) is one per 3 million doses of OPV with the highest risk being associated with the first dose. During eradication, the first serotype to disappear is type 2 followed by serotypes 3 and 1.

Poliomyelitis exists worldwide except where it has been eradicated. In temperate climates the disease is seasonal, occurring more commonly in summer and early autumn. The incidence of Poliomyelitis increases during July to September coinciding with the rainy season.

Transmission occurs by the fecal-oral route, and is most common where sanitation is poor. One week after onset of paralysis, little poliovirus remains in the throat, but continues to be excreted in the stool for 6 to 8 weeks. Infected persons are most infectious during the first few days before and after the onset of symptoms.

Humans comprise the only reservoir for wild polioviruses, and infection is spread from person to person. A long-term carrier state does not occur. The half-life of excreted virus in the sewage in a warm climate is only 48 hours and spread of infection through sewage can only occur during this period.

The incubation period from exposure to the virus until the onset of symptoms is 7-10 days (range, 4-30 days). The initial illness is followed by a symptom-free interval lasting a few days before the onset of paralysis.

All un-immunized persons are susceptible to poliomyelitis. Epidemiological evidence shows that infants born to mothers with antibodies are protected naturally against paralytic disease for about six months. Immunity is obtained through infection by the wild virus or through immunization. Natural infection (including inapparent and mild infection) or a completed series of immunizations with live oral polio vaccine (OPV) results in both humoral and local intestinal immunity. For every child who develops paralytic poliomyelitis, 100 to 1000 children have clinically inapparent infection. Given the large number of inapparent infections it is often difficult to find the source of a case. The detection of even one case of polio indicates that transmission of wild polioviruses is occurring in the community. The surveillance of all cases of acute flaccid paralysis occurring in children aged <15 years will identify the areas with continuing transmission of poliovirus and help in targeting interventions.

The oral poliomyelitis vaccine (OPV) contains live attenuated polioviruses. Because the virus in the vaccine is live and is administered orally (mimicking the natural route of infection), it can also be transmitted from a recently vaccinated person to close contacts that have not been immunized. The disease can be eradicated by replacing the circulation of the wild poliovirus with vaccine poliovirus. The administration of vaccine virus to a large group of children (children < 5 years of age) in the shortest possible time as in case of National Immunization Days gives rise to more extensive dissemination of excreted virus than occurs during epidemic cycles of natural disease. The net result is abrupt interruption of the transmission of wild poliovirus in the community, a result that cannot otherwise be achieved in areas of poor sanitation by year-round routine immunization alone.


Strategies for Polio Eradication Go To Top
 

The strategies used in the polio eradication program are based on knowledge about the disease, the vaccine, and effective methods for the control of polio.

Four Key Strategies:
  • Achieve and maintain the highest coverage levels possible through the administration of OPV in the routine immunization program. The routine program alone, however, is not sufficient to interrupt transmission of wild poliovirus.

  • Implement nation-wide mass immunization campaigns. To achieve the goal of eradication of wild poliovirus transmission by the year 2005, the Ministry of Health, GON has conducted National Immunization Days (NIDs) every year since 1996, usually during the low poliovirus transmission season (December/January or January/February) in most parts of the country and during Aug/Sept in Himali districts. All children aged <5 years are targeted throughout the country to receive two doses of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) on these days. NIDs will be repeated at least yearly or more often in the later stage of eradication until wild poliovirus transmission is interrupted.

  • Strengthen surveillance of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) so that all cases of polio are detected, reported, and investigated in order to identify the precise location of any remaining reservoirs of wild poliovirus. Surveillance system can fully monitor the impact of NIDs in Nepal and also provide the tool to identify areas for focused supplemental immunization activity in the end stage of polio eradication. Surveillance system can fully monitor the impact of NIDs in Nepal and also provide the tool to identify areas for focused supplemental immunization activity in the end stage of polio eradication. Otherwise, the huge investment of human and financial resources in NIDs may be wasted.

  • "Mop-up" campaigns. These are intensive, house-to-house immunization campaigns that are conducted during the final stages of polio eradication and done when transmission of wild poliovirus is limited to focal areas. The area and population to be targeted depend upon effective surveillance to provide evidence of the geographic location(s) of persistent wild poliovirus transmission.

Polio Vaccine Go To Top
 

Two highly effective vaccines are available for the prevention of poliomyelitis: inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) and live attenuated trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). IPV first became available in 1955 and was followed by OPV, since 1963.

OPV is the vaccine of choice for polio eradication. OPV used in NIDs is the only proven strategy to achieve the goal of polio eradication. OPV is also the only vaccine effective in outbreak control. Not only does OPV induce intestinal immunity, thereby preventing infection with wild poliovirus; but also it is logistically much easier than IPV to administer and is much cheaper than IPV; and has the ability to induce immunity in unvaccinated contacts.

Injectable polio vaccine protects against clinical disease and suppresses pharyngeal excretion of the virus, but has less of an effect on intestinal excretion and transmission of poliovirus to other susceptible individuals. Vaccinating children with IPV would reduce the number of paralysis cases due to vaccine, but would have little effect on the transmission of wild poliovirus, which is by the oral-fecal route.


Acute Flaccid Paralysis

Go To Top
 

AFP is a syndrome occurs in many diseases and conditions like GBS, TM, TN, Poliomyelitis etc. The polio surveillance system is based upon surveillance for AFP. Acute flaccid paralysis means that paralysis is of acute onset (< 4 days from onset of weakness to paralysis) and the affected limb or limbs are flaccid, i.e. floppy or limp. Tone is diminished as evidenced by examination by palpation or passive movement of joints.

Acute : Rapid evolution from onset of weakness to paralysis.
Flaccid : Floppy, not stiff or spastic.
Paralysis : Inability to move affected part.

This excludes adults, spastic paralysis, old cases or cases with obvious causes (trauma).
Surveillance is carried out for all cases of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) and not only for poliomyelitis. Therefore, all AFP cases should be reported, regardless of the final diagnosis. Because paralytic poliomyelitis is only one cause of AFP, maintaining a high sensitivity of AFP reporting will ensure that all cases of paralytic poliomyelitis are detected, reported, and investigated, resulting in preventive control measures to interrupt transmission of disease.

Occasionally, poliomyelitis may occur in older children. AFP surveillance focuses on children aged <15 years in order to capture the occasional case that may occur in older children. Any case of AFP regardless of age should be reported and investigated if poliomyelitis is a possible cause.

Experience in other parts of the world shows that at least 1 case of AFP occurs annually for every 100,000 children aged <15 years. This is referred to as the "background" rate of AFP among children. The non-polio causes of AFP such as Guillian-Barre Syndrome (GBS), Transverse Myelitis, and Traumatic Neuritis account for this background rate, regardless of whether acute poliomyelitis exists in the community.

Based on the estimated population of children aged <15 years in Nepal, the table in Annex A shows the number of expected AFP cases that should be detected in each district regardless of whether polio is occurring. For example, if an area has 1 lakh (100,000) children <15 years of age, then at least 1 non-polio AFP case should be reported each year (population <15 years of age/100,000). The goal in Nepal is to have all districts reporting non-polio AFP rates of at least 1 case per 100,000 children aged <15 years. Reported non-polio AFP rates less than this would suggest that surveillance is not sensitive enough to detect all cases of paralytic poliomyelitis.


Case Classification

Go To Top
 

It should be stressed that surveillance is carried out for all cases of acute flaccid paralysis, not only for poliomyelitis.  Special effort should be made to obtain stool specimens from all AFP cases.

Surveillance is carried out for acute flaccid paralysis of any cause, not only for poliomyelitis.

An AFP case is any case of acute flaccid paralysis in a person under 15 years of age for any reason other than severe trauma, or paralytic illness in a person of any age in which polio is suspected.
Within 90 days of paralysis onset an AFP case should be classified as “polio” or “polio- compatible”, or "discarded" as non-polio AFP. The WHO case classification diagram gives the criteria by which AFP cases are classified as confirmed paralytic poliomyelitis or discarded as non-polio AFP.

Since January 2001, Nepal has been using the virological case classification scheme.
Under the virological scheme, cases with adequate specimens testing negative in an accredited laboratory are discarded as non-polio AFP. However, cases with no or inadequate stool specimens and having residual weakness present on 60 day follow up or lost to follow up or died before 6o days follow up should be presented to Expert Review Committee (ERC) for final classification because of the absence of reliable virological results.

Only cases for which wild poliovirus is isolated will be confirmed as polio. All cases for which adequate specimens test negative are discarded as non-polio AFP. However, cases without adequate specimens can still be discarded as non-polio AFP if there is reliable follow-up information indicating ‘no residual paralysis’.

Cases with inadequate specimens and either residual paralysis on 60 day follow up or no follow-up present the biggest challenge in terms of ruling out polio. In the virological scheme, this group of cases presented to ERC for review to conclude final classification. The ERC will either discard the case as non-polio, or – if polio cannot be ruled out reliably- will classify it as ‘polio-compatible’. Polio-compatible cases are neither confirmed nor discarded as polio. Polio compatible cases indicate surveillance failure.

Cases of AFP are classified as polio if:
  • Wild poliovirus was isolated from any stool specimen

Cases of AFP without isolation of wild poliovirus may be classified as “polio compatible” if:
  • Stool specimens were inadequate

AND

  • Residual weakness was present 60 days after onset of paralysis or 60 day follow up was not done (due to death or absence)

AND

  • “Expert review committee” concludes that these cases could not be discarded as “non-polio” based on available data.

This is important to document the background AFP reporting rate, which indirectly monitors the sensitivity of the surveillance system.

Adequate specimen can be defined as two specimens, collected within 14 days of onset of paralysis, at least 24 hours apart; each of adequate volume (8-10 g) and arriving at a WHO accredited laboratory in good condition. Good condition means no desiccation, no leakage, adequate documentation and evidence that the cold chain was maintained.




Virological Case Classification System

Go To Top


*Adequate specimens: two stool specimens, collected at least 24 hours apart, 0 – 14 days after the onset of paralysis, and arriving in the lab with ice present (or still frozen icepacks), in sufficient quantity for complete analysis, accompanied by proper documentation, and processed in a WHO–accredited poliovirus laboratory.



AFP Surveillance Go To Top
 

The main objectives of AFP surveillance are:

  1. Identify the presence and location of poliovirus
  2. Demonstrate, through data, absence of poliovirus

Reporting units have been identified to include all centers where paralytic cases might be brought for diagnosis, treatment, or rehabilitation. This network of reporting units comprises the basic framework of the surveillance system.

There should be at least one of these reporting units in each district.  As a general rule, when no cases of paralytic polio are occurring, there should be at least 5 reporting sites per 100,000 population <15 years of age.  However, the number of reporting units may vary widely; for example, some areas may have one reporting unit consisting of a hospital that adequately covers a large population, while other areas may require 10-15 units for adequate coverage. There should be special emphasis on recruiting units in areas of Nepal, which border India.  Each unit should be requested to report immediately to the district health office and/or SMO if a case of AFP is seen.  The components of AFP case reporting include: 1) Immediate reporting 2) Weekly reporting, and 3) Monthly reporting.

  • Network of AFP Reporting Units: A number of health facilities, including hospitals, medical college hospitals, health centers, and private nursing homes, PHCs, health posts and sub-health posts that are likely to see AFP cases, are listed and established as reporting units. 

  • Initial Identification and Immediate Reporting of AFP Cases: Each reporting unit should identify one individual (and one or two alternates) who is responsible for identifying and immediately reporting cases of AFP to the DHO/DPHO or the SMO by the quickest means possible (telephone, telegram, or fax) and if the case is reported to the DHO/DPHO, he must report it to the designated SMO immediately.

  • Initial Investigation of Reported AFP Cases: All reported cases should be verified by the responsible SMO or (other trained investigator if SMO cannot readily go to verify) within 48 hours after notification, in order to confirm AFP and to obtain laboratory (stool) specimens from the case.  The SMO should fill out the case investigation form and send a copy to the Surveillance Coordinator at the WHO-IPD Office in Lalitpur.  If initially a case is investigated by a person other than the SMO, the SMO should follow up to verify the case.  The SMO should report the case immediately to the DHO or DPHO, who should initiate appropriate action for outbreak response immunization when indicated.  Information about the outbreak response immunization (ORI) should be recorded on the case investigation form.
  • 60-day Follow-up: The SMO must re-visit between 60 to 80 days of onset of paralysis to the AFP cases with inadequate stool collection and AFP cases with adequate stool collection but vaccine virus isolated in lab result to confirm the presence or absence of residual paralysis.  This is important so that cases may be classified within 90 days of onset.
     
  • Weekly Reporting:  At the end of each week, the Reporting Unit should report to the SMO all new AFP cases reported to the SMO during the preceding week. Reporting by the Reporting Units to the SMO should take place even when no cases of AFP have been identified (“zero reporting”) – that is, even if zero cases of AFP occurred during the previous week, the reporting unit should send the completed form indicating “zero” cases for that week to the concerned SMO.

  • Monthly Reporting: At the end of each month, DHO/DPHO should report monthly summarized zero report to the SMO even in absence of AFP case. This is done to summarize the district report received through HMIS.
  • Active Surveillance:  One of the most critical units in the reporting system is the hospital.  Case finding through the emergency department, pediatric and neurology wards, as well as through outpatient clinics, is critical to the success of this surveillance system.  The SMO should regularly visit these hospitals to ensure that AFP cases are reported, do record review, encourage reporting from private doctors, and look for new cases.  Apart from this, health workers at all levels must be encouraged to report AFP cases immediately. 
SMOs must make special efforts to meet personally with hospital staff to obtain their cooperation and continued involvement in reporting AFP.  At lest 2 staff members in each reporting unit have been identified as the focal persons who are responsible for reporting.  It must be explained clearly to clinicians that even cases that are not likely to be poliomyelitis need to be reported if they fit the case definition of AFP and that adequate stool specimens must be collected from every AFP case.



Case Investigation

Go To Top
 

All cases should be verified and investigated within 48 hours of notification by the SMO.  

Verification:  Once an AFP case is reported from a physician/health unit or any othersource, the SMO must personally see this case to ascertain if the case meets the AFP case definition.   If AFP is NOT present, the SMO may discuss his findings with the reporting physician/health worker and discard the case as not AFP on the Case Investigation Form.

Investigation:  Upon verification, the SMO determines the case is AFP.  He must then commence the investigation.  The necessary steps in the investigation of all AFP cases are outlined below:

  1. If case is reported from a remote area or a Phase III area, the SMO should coordinate the investigation with the District office and concerned health staff.
  2. Once case is verified as AFP, collect all available demographic and clinical information on the case.
  3. Fill out AFP case investigation form and assign EPID number.  Copies of case investigation forms should be sent by the SMO to the WHO-IPD central office in Lalitpur.
  4. Collect two stool specimens from the case at a minimum interval of 24 hours. Even if you are in doubt as to whether it is AFP or not it is better to collect stool specimens.  Each specimen should be 8 grams (each approximately the size of an adult thumb).  Stool cultures have the maximum chance of yielding a positive result if the specimen is collected within 2 weeks (14 days) of paralysis onset.  If collected after 14 days, the specimen will be considered inadequate.  Therefore, all efforts must be taken to collect stool specimens within 2 weeks of paralysis onset. If stool cannot be collected from the case, the SMO should be diligent in collecting detailed epidemiological and clinical case information because the case may be presented to the Expert Review Committee for classification.
  5. Establish a time and place for the 60-day follow-up examination of the case in order to assess presence of residual paralysis or weakness.

If the onset of paralysis occurred at some time within the previous 12 months, enroll the case in IFA database and initiate community investigation to identify additional cases.

The SMO should visit the home of each AFP case to obtain further epidemiological information.  A line listing of all AFP cases should be maintained by the field offices.  Inquiries should be made to determine whether other AFP cases have appeared in places the case had visited during the month prior to paralysis.



Outbreak Response Immunization (ORI)

Go To Top
 

ORI is limited in its potential to stop wild poliovirus transmission.  It is an effective tool in raising awareness of the importance of immunization coverage in that particular area among the district officers as well as among the public.  It also allows for the opportunity to motivate health staff as well as conduct active search of AFP.

It is important that all stool specimens are collected prior to the start of outbreak response immunization (ORI); otherwise, vaccine virus may interfere with attempts to isolate the wild virus from AFP cases and contacts. The house-to-house campaign approach is the most effective method for outbreak response.

When it is decided that ORI is necessary, certain information should be gathered and a plan of required actions developed by the DHO.  It is important to note the DHO and designated district team will conduct ORI.  The SMO will assist and provide necessary materials.  The following points should be considered in managing an outbreak.
-     Population data - obtain most recent population size and distribution.
-     What is the level of EPI coverage? - Coverage rate using existing data; conduct a quick assessment to assess immunization coverage in the area at that time.

  1. Where are the cases? - Spot map to mark the location of case(s) and areas targeted for immunization on a map.
  2. Has an NID or SNID been conducted recently?
  3. Look for additional cases of AFP in the area

Target Group: Children aged less than 5 years should receive one dose of OPV, regardless of OPV immunization history

Each case of paralytic poliomyelitis probably represents 100 to 1,000 asymptomatic infected persons.  As a result, the spread of the virus may be wider than the local area where the case resides.  The number of children to be vaccinated will depend upon the population density.  For example, in the Terai, and entire village of perhaps 300-500 children may be targeted, whereas in the mountains, where the population is more scattered, only 50-200 children may be targeted. 

Resources:  It is important to determine what resources are available at all levels (transportation, vaccine, cold chain materials, etc.). 

Coordination:  Keep the appropriate health/community authorities informed regarding when and where the team will be arriving, and ask that local health staff/community representatives be present.

Supplies:  The necessary supplies to take to the outbreak area include:
-     Adequate quantities of OPV, based on estimated target population.
-     Cold chain equipment: ice packs, cold boxes, vaccine carriers, and vaccine monitor thermometers.  .
-     Adequate supply of forms: case investigation, laboratory, and line list forms.

Outbreak Monitoring: Information on cases, immunization coverage monitored during an outbreak.

Additional Case Finding during a quick assessment and/or ORI: All attempts should be made to find additional cases during an AFP investigation.  In conjunction, community leaders should be contacted and their assistance obtained.  Door-to-door searches are an effective way to find additional cases, particularly in areas where patients are not likely to seek medical care. Each temple, preschool center, school, hospital, clinic, drugstore, and rehabilitation center in the affected area must be identified and listed.

In larger population centers, contacts may also include selected medical professionals, such as pediatricians and neurologists.  Efforts to identify additional cases should extend well beyond the neighborhood or community in which the AFP case lives.



Virus Isolation & Specimen Collection and Transport Procedures

Go To Top
 
Experience has shown that for eradication of wild poliovirus, stool specimen culture is by far the best diagnostic test.  The following summarizes the available diagnostic tests.

Stool:  Recommended in every case of AFP. Virus usually can be found in the feces from 72 hours to up to 8 or more weeks after infection, with the highest probability during the first 2 weeks.

Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF): Not recommended. Not likely to yield virus, and therefore, its collection is not recommended for culture.  However, the CSF cell count, gram stain, protein, and glucose may be very useful in eliminating other conditions that cause AFP.  

Throat: Not recommended.  Not as likely as stool to yield virus and therefore specimen collection from this site is not recommended.
Blood: Not recommended. Not likely to yield virus, and current serologic tests cannot differentiate between wild and vaccine virus strains.  Experience has shown that, for polio, interpretation of serologic data can often be misleading.  Collection of blood specimens for culture or serology is therefore not recommended.

Isolation of wild poliovirus from stool is the best way to confirm the diagnosis of paralytic poliomyelitis.

For all AFP cases, two stool specimens should be collected within 2 weeks after the onset of paralysis, at least 24 hours apart.  Collection of specimens within 2 weeks of the onset of paralysis is important because virus excretion diminishes markedly after 2 weeks following onset of paralysis, resulting in a reduction of the sensitivity of poliovirus detection.

Collection of contact specimens is generally not recommended, but may be needed in special circumstances.  One such circumstance is when adequate stool specimens are not collected from the case, for example if the case dies before stool collection can occur or if the case is reported late.  In this circumstance, collect one specimen from each of 5 contacts and send for laboratory testing.

Before collecting stool specimens from contacts, make sure the child has not received OPV with the previous 30 days.



Transportation of stool specimen

Proper Collection:

  • Stool must be placed in a clean container such as a wide-mouthed plastic or glass bottle with a screw-on cap.
  • Two 8-gram specimens should be collected at least 24 hours apart.
  • During storage, before dispatch these should be placed in sealed (“ziplock”) plastic bags and stored dependently in good condition on ice or icepacks 

         
If collection needs to occur in home by parents/family member:

  • Advise family on the above steps and arrange for proper storage until the specimens can be either retrieved in person or arrangements can be made to have specimens sent to the field office. 
  • Provide family with proper collection materials.  Make sure all collection containers are properly labeled.
  • Arrangements include provision of cooler box, ice packs, containers, plastic bags, and labels.

From field office to main office:

  • Specimens should be sent ASAP (at the latest within 3 days of collection) directly to the WHO-IPD main office.
  • Once specimen is received in field office, the field office assistant must ascertain cold chain maintenance prior to and during shipment.
  • Proper storage means in the freezer or any container that maintains temperatures below 80C, independent of vaccines and other clean items.  This is necessary for storage as well as during shipment.
  • A specimen carrier should be distinctively labeled to avoid the risk of its being mixed with other vaccine carriers used for the transportation of vaccines.
  • Submit case investigation form along with the laboratory form when sending the specimens.
  • Notify WHO-IPD main office of arrival time, site and mode of transport by fax, followed by a phone call.  Follow-up to ensure specimen arrival.

Specimens must arrive at the laboratory in good condition on ice or icepacks that have not melted completely during transport.  If specimens arrive with no ice, then the criteria for transport of specimens will not have been met.  If wild poliovirus is present in the stool, its identification will be impossible if temperatures are not maintained in transport.  This process of transportation of stool specimens under cold chain conditions to the laboratory for poliovirus testing is often referred to as the "reverse cold chain."

Maintenance of the "reverse" cold chain also requires advance notice to the central office of WHO-IPD in Kathmandu.  Specimens should always be hand-carried by a reliable messenger and make sure that the surveillance unit is informed before sending it.  Shipping specimens close to a weekend or holiday rather than early in the week is hazardous, because of the risk of arriving at a time that government and WHO-IPD offices are closed. So do not send specimen on a weekend or holiday, if it has to be sent make sure the office is notified before sending it. The completed case investigation form and the polio laboratory form should also accompany the specimens to Kathmandu.

Unless the ice is replaced along the route as in hand-carried shipments, shipment from origin to destination should never take longer than 1-2 days.  Care must be taken not to leave specimen containers in the sun or heat during transit. These case details are very important for the most accurate interpretation of the results and for epidemiological analysis.

Stool specimens are received, unpacked, and registered in the central office of WHO-IPD, Kathmandu.  They are stored at less than + 80C on a short-term basis.  There is no laboratory in Nepal that is capable of isolating poliovirus; therefore the WHO-accredited Poliovirus Laboratory in Bangkok, Thailand is used.  Each Wednesday the specimens are transported by air cargo to this lab.      A cover letter is faxed (and sent with the specimens) to the Bangkok lab.  There is frequent communication between WHO-IPD Khatmandu and the lab.  Once the specimen arrives in Bangkok, the lab sends a confirmation email to WHO-IPD notifying them of the arrival and condition of specimens.  The basic poliovirus culture steps are summarized below for those who are interested.


Laboratory Methods 

Stool specimens are first diluted into a 10% stool suspension and then inoculated into cell cultures that are able to maintain the growth of polioviruses.  Polioviruses cause a typical cytopathic effect (CPE) when observed in cell culture.  For polioviruses, CPE usually occurs within 48 hours after inoculation, whereas other enteroviruses may take several days longer.  Poliovirus is identified using enterovirus-pooled antiserum and further confirmed with a neutralization test using monospecific polio antiserum.  This primary identification indicates whether poliovirus type 1, 2, or 3 is present.

If a poliovirus is isolated, special tests are conducted to characterize vaccine-related from wild polioviruses.  This process is call intratypic differentiation (ITD) and is important in determining whether the poliovirus isolated is a “wild” type.  The poliovirus laboratory for Nepal is located at the National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand, which performs both poliovirus culture and intratypic differentiation.

A minimum of 28 days is required to isolate and identify polioviruses when one cell culture passage is successful in demonstrating the cytopathic effect of poliovirus.  Difficult specimens require repeat cell culture passage, often because the presence of stool toxins in the specimen can make it difficult to interpret whether the observed cellular effect in culture is due to poliovirus or to the toxins themselves.  Because cultures require time to grow, the results should not be expected any sooner than 6 weeks of the receipt of specimens at the laboratory.

Factors that influence poliovirus isolation results include intermittent excretion of the virus in the stool, insufficient material collected, collection too late in the course of the illness, inadequate storage and shipping procedures of specimens, and poor laboratory technique.  The enterovirus isolation rate from stool specimens should be monitored, as this serves as an indirect indicator of the sensitivity of virus isolation at that lab.  In tropical areas, non-polio enteroviruses should be isolated from at least 10% of specimens.


C. Outbreak Definitions

The identification of an outbreak will trigger control measures.  For this plan, an outbreak of poliomyelitis due to wild type strains will be classified as confirmed.  A confirmed outbreak is defined as: 

  • one or more cases of acute flaccid paralysis with isolation of wild poliovirus.

              A suspected outbreak of poliomyelitis is defined as:

  • a cluster (i.e., two or more) of AFP cases, classified as polio-compatible or vaccine derivedpoliovirus by the National Expert Committee, which occurred within a two-month period in the same or adjacent districts. 
  • a cluster of AFP cases strongly suggestive of clinical polio with onset in the same or adjacent districts within a two-month period. A “strongly suggestive case” is likely to be less than five years old, fever at onset, asymmetrical paralysis and incomplete vaccinated children.

Surveillance Program Indicators Go To Top
 

The quality of surveillance may be assessed in several ways.  The two most important surveillance performance indicators are 1) the rate of non-polio AFP cases per 100,000 children <15 years of age and 2) the percentage of AFP cases from which two adequate stool specimens are collected.  In addition, evaluation of the completeness of weekly "zero" reporting is very important to ensure that regular AFP surveillance is functioning in every geopolitical unit of the country.  These and other performance indicators for both integrated surveillance in general and AFP in particular are discussed in Chapter 5.



Data Analysis And Monitoring

Go To Top

An important aspect of a successful polio eradication program is a well-developed information system one that provides program managers and health workers with the necessary information to take appropriate actions.

AFP cases should be plotted on a map according to their place of residence and the plot compared with coverage data and surveillance reporting sites.  These maps can be useful for coordinating activities (such as vaccination points, etc.).  This information will also help determine whether improvements in surveillance contacts are needed.

Terai: SMOs should maintain spot maps for wild polio cases in India bordering their districts.  This will help in targeting areas of surveillance and immunization coverage rates. Accurate information on the vaccination history of persons with poliomyelitis is essential for evaluating vaccine efficacy and possible cold chain problems. Monitoring techniques for performance of program strategies are outlined in Chapter 5.



Clinical Aspects of Paralytic Poliomyelitis Go To Top
 

The quality of surveillance may be assessed in several ways.  The two most important surveillance performance indicators are 1) the rate of non-polio AFP cases per 100,000 children <15 years of age and 2) the percentage of AFP cases from which two adequate stool specimens are collected.  In addition, evaluation of the completeness of weekly "zero" reporting is very important to ensure that regular AFP surveillance is functioning in every geopolitical unit of the country.  These and other performance indicators for both integrated surveillance in general and AFP in particular are discussed in Chapter 5.

Major Signs and Symptoms of Paralytic
Poliomyelitis In the Acute Phase

Acute onset
Fever just prior to paralysis – hallmark finding.
Muscle pain.
Asymmetrical paralysis.
Absent or diminished DTRs.
No sensory loss.

A hallmark of paralytic poliomyelitis is fever just prior to the onset of paralysis. Other associated symptoms may include malaise, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, headache, sore throat, constipation, and abdominal pain. Signs of meningeal irritation may be present, i.e. stiffness of neck and back muscles. The tripod sign may be present; i.e. the child finds difficulty in sitting and sits by supporting hands at the back and by partially flexing the hips and knees.

Progression of the paralysis to reach its maximum in the majority of cases occurs within 4 days; however; a few may take 4 – 7 days. The paralysis is usually descending, i.e. starting from the trunk at the shoulder or hip and moving distally down the extremity. The paralysis tends to be asymmetrical, and muscle strength may vary in the muscle groups of different limbs. However, proximal muscle groups are more involved as compared to distal ones. DTRs are diminished before the onset of paralysis. Cranial nerve involvement is seen in the bulbar and bulbospinal forms of paralytic poliomyelitis, but is not common. Facial asymmetry may be present, with difficulty in swallowing, weakness, or loss of voice. Respiratory insufficiency can be life–threatening and may lead to death.
Diagnosis is confirmed by isolation of wild poliovirus from the stool specimen. In polio, the spinal fluid is inflammatory and it may or may not be under pressure. The fluid may be transparent or slightly turbid. Protein is increased moderately to 40 – 65 mg. From 20 – 300 cells per mm3 are present with polymorphonuclear leukocytosis initially, but later a shift toward lymphocytosis occurs.


Differential diagnosis of acute flaccid paralysis(AFP)

Go To Top
 

Guillain – Barré Syndrome (GBS):
GBS is another common cause of AFP. GBS is an acquired demyelinating disease of the peripheral nervous system with major features of weakness and areflexia. Fever occurs about 2 – 3 weeks prior to onset of paralysis. The paralysis in GBS is flaccid and tends to be symmetrical, with absent or diminished deep tendon reflexes (DTRs). In general, the paralysis of GBS occurs in an ascending fashi1on, affecting lower limbs first, followed by trunk, then upper limbs. Bilateral cranial nerve involvement is common, especially involving the facial nerve. Ninth and tenth cranial nerve involvement causing difficulty in swallowing is the second most commonly observed cranial nerve abnormality. Pain and muscle tenderness is prominent at the onset of paralysis. Sensory deficit is frequently present but is difficult to elicit in children.

The reported annual incidence rate of GBS in Latin America is highest in the age group 1 – 4 years with a mean of 0.9/100,000 population aged 1 – 4 years. GBS also occurs in adults. The clinician should be aware that some age overlap exists between case of paralytic poliomyelitis and GBS.
Persons with GBS often complain of hypesthesia or anesthesia in a glove–stocking distribution. Tingling and burning sensations in the soles and palms are also frequent, as well as cramps in the peroneal muscles; however, the child with GBS is not disturbed by handling or changes in position, as is the child with polio.

Electrophysiologic study is preferably performed 3 weeks after onset of flaccid paralysis. Electromyography in GBS remains normal or minimally abnormal in severe cases. In GBS the demyelination of the peripheral nerves greatly reduces impulse conduction velocity but does not stop the conduction altogether. In GBS sensory nerve conduction time is also slow.
The most important feature of GBS is an increase in protein (up to 200 mg), with a cell count usually 10 or fewer monocytes per mm3 of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). A CSF white count of 50 or more is strong evidence against the diagnosis of GBS.
            The prognosis of GBS is good, with complete recovery in the majority of cases. However, sequel in children with GBS may be present at 3 months after onset of paralysis, characterized by bilateral foot drop, weakness of grip, wrist drop, symmetrical atrophy of peroneal and anterior tibial muscles in legs, and atrophy of the thenar and hypothenar eminence in palms.

Features differentiating GBS from paralytic poliomyelitis are:

*     Age: The maximum number of cases of polio occurs in children aged below 3 years, while GBS is more likely to occur in individuals aged more than 2 years. There is age overlap at 3–4 years for both diseases. GBS is very rare in children < 1 year of age.
*     Fever: In polio fever is typically present just prior to the onset of paralysis, while in GBS it is 2–3 week's prior.
*     Paralysis: In polio paralysis is asymmetrical and initially involves large proximal muscles. In GBS, paralysis is symmetrical and usually involves distal smaller muscles. In GBS, the paralysis is ascending from the feet, while in polio it is descending from the shoulder or hip muscles.
*     CSF findings: In polio CSF shows 20 – 300 WBCs and protein is normal or minimally elevated, while in GBS, WBCs usually < 10 and proteins are up to 200 mg.
*     Although not routinely done, electrophysiologic diagnostic testing is occasionally performed. The usual findings are
       –     Nerve: Nerve conduction velocity may be normal in polio, but is reduced in GBS.
       –     EMG: Electromyography is highly abnormal in polio with signs of denervation and giant action potential, while in GBS its is normal or slightly abnormal. However, a normal EMG does not rule out polio.

           
Transverse Myelitis (TM):

Transverse myelitis may occur in persons aged 4 years and above. Fever may be present before the onset of AFP, but rarely during onset. Paralysis is usually symmetrical in the lower limbs and is accompanied by profound anesthesia to all forms of sensation. The site of involvement is usually the thoracic cord, but can be lumbar, thoracic, or cervical. Arms may also be partially paralyzed, but this occurrence is infrequent. Hypotonia is present and DTRs are absent in TM. The most common sequence of symptoms is flaccidity of legs, followed by loss of control of rectal and bladder sphincters. Recovery is related to onset when onset is fulminate or rapid (within hours), recovery usually begins several weeks to months later, and neurologic deficits remain. In contrast, children whose paralysis took several days to develop to completion usually begin to recover 1 to 5 days after symptoms peak and may recover completely. Flaccidity gradually may change to spasticity after several weeks and areflexia may be replaced by hyperreflexia.

Features differentiating transverse myelitis from polio are:
*     Age: Polio tends to affect children aged less than 3 years, while TM occurs mainly in persons aged more than 4 years.
*     Paralysis: The paralysis of polio tends to be asymmetrical and mostly involves the large proximal muscles, while the paralysis of TM is more often symmetrical and may involve trunk and both lower limbs.
*     Sensory: In polio there is no sensory loss, while in TM there is marked sensory loss.
*     Autonomic: In polio bladder retention my occasionally occur, while in TM there is marked dysfunction of the bladder and bowel sphincters.
*     CSF: In polio abnormal, while in TM normal.

 
Traumatic Neuritis:

Traumatic neuritis caused by injections may lead to AFP of the lower extremity. The onset of AFP in the affected lower limb occurs from 1 hour to 5 days after injection in the gluteal region. Fever is usually present before the onset of paralysis because often the injection has been given for a preexisting febrile illness. The sequence may be difficult to establish when several injections are applied in both gluteus muscles. AFP is usually accompanied by pain in the gluteal region or along the affected leg. Atrophy may appear 40 to 60 days later. Knee jerk is present. Ankle jerk is absent or diminished. Hip and knee strength is normal. The child walks with a foot drop. However, atrophy caused by a traumatic injection never reaches the degree seen in polio. Differences in calf circumference usually do not exceed 0.5 to 1.5 cm. Rarely; children are affected in both lower limbs because injections were given in both sides. Sequel is rarely severe and children gradually recover with physiotherapy within 3 to 9 months.
           
Differentiating features of traumatic neuritis (TN) from polio are:
*     Age: Polio occurs mainly below 3 years of age, while in TN there is no specific age distribution.
*     Paralysis: In polio the large proximal muscle groups are involved although any group of muscles may be affected and the DTRs are diminished. In TN only one leg is involved below the knee, and the knee jerk is normal while the ankle jerk is diminished.

Non–polio Enteroviruses (NPEV):

A number of other non-–polio enteroviruses are known to cause AFP. Many of the Coxsackie A viruses, most of the Coxsackie B and Echoviruses, Enterovirus types 70 and 71, as well as the mumps virus, have been temporally associated with both mild and severe neurolytic disease. Although most cases show a course of improvement with complete recovery, in some cases sequel may mimic paralysis caused by wild poliovirus. Because healthy children excrete other non-–polio enteroviruses, the isolation of non-–polio enteroviruses from patients with AFP may not be proof of causal relationship.

Other Conditions:

Other peripheral neuropathies that present as flaccid paralysis are caused by metabolic defects (diabetic), toxins (including lipid solvents and fish toxins), organophosphate pesticides, raw metals (lead), several pharmacological products, hereditary disease (Charcot – Marie – Tooth), diphtheria toxin and tick bite. The clinical picture of post – diphtheritic paralysis is similar to GBS. However, prior history of sore throat, nasal twang, and nasal regurgitation of fluids about 2 may differentiate it – 7 weeks before onset of paralysis.
            The paralytic sequel of polio is generally more severe and permanent, and atrophy of muscles and shortening of one lower limb may be present. AFP due to causes other than polio tends to resolve or improve within 60 days of onset.

Tumors may lead to acute flaccid paralysis that is asymmetrical. Progression is usually slow and generally there is no fever associated with paralysis onset. Distribution of nerve involvement is dependent upon the anatomic location of the space-occupying lesion.

The differential diagnosis of acute flaccid paralysis is extensive. In order to manage effectively children with poliomyelitis, the clinician must be fully aware of the other causes of acute flaccid paralysis. The importance stool specimens for viral culture and 60–day follow–up is paramount.

Diagnostic dilemmas:

The differential diagnosis of AFP may at times be quite confusing, even in the best of hands. Difficulties arise particularly with 2–5 year–old children, who present with paralysis of both lower limbs. In this example, the history of fever is not definite. There may have been a mild upper respiratory tract infection or gastrointestinal disturbance before the onset of paralysis. The paralysis is of sudden onset and parents are unable to define whether it is ascending or descending. Slight asymmetry may be seen in GBS, also. Sensory loss, though specific for GBS, is not always possible to elicit in children. In this example, the CSF exam is useful, but if traumatic further delays diagnosis. Stool specimens will be helpful, but results are not available for 2–3 weeks. The clinician should re–evaluate confusing cases at more frequent intervals, perhaps after 2–3 days or after a week, and not hesitate to obtain second opinions. Electrophysiologic studies can help, but may not always be possible to obtain.

Other dilemmas occur when children present with generalized paralysis, which is rapid in onset and progression and has cranial nerve involvement. Unilateral facial nerve involvement favors the diagnosis of paralytic poliomyelitis, rather than GBS. Sensory loss will favor GBS. Children  < 1 year of age should be checked for hypokalemia. In general, in children < 1 year of age with AFP the clinician should be keenly aware of other treatable causes of paralysis and "pseudo" paralysis, such as scurvy, congenital syphilis, and low potassium (hypokalemia).

In a child with unilateral lower limb involvement, diagnosis may be confused with traumatic neuritis. Although not as common, paralytic poliomyelitis may present with weakness of the anterior tibialis leading to foot drop. Involvement of the gluteal and quadriceps muscles may be minimal. If the child in the supine position keeps the affected hypotonic limb in external rotation at the hip, paralytic poliomyelitis should be considered. A diminished knee jerk also supports the diagnosis of paralytic poliomyelitis. However, if the child is irritable, then reflexes may be difficult to elicit. A history of intramuscular injection in the gluteal area will favor the diagnosis of TN. In TN the knee jerk should be normal and the ankle jerk diminished. In general, residual paralysis of the lower limb, which does not involve the gluteus maximus, quadriceps, or anterior tibialis muscles, is unlikely to paralytic poliomyelitis.

In summary, the examination of the sick child is by nature difficult. A difficult history from parents can make the less common, atypical presentations even more confusing. Second opinions should be obtained when the diagnosis in not clear. Other measures that can be taken to increase accuracy of diagnosis include: (1) obtaining stools specimens for culture on all patients with AFP; (2) completing the 60 day follow–up examination; and (3) establishing expert review boards to evaluate case records of difficult patients.

           
"Pseudo" paralysis:

Certain conditions present with "pseudo" paralysis, which may be confused with AFP. These conditions are not AFP and should not be reported as AFP. Unrecognized trauma from contusions, sprains, or fractures is common sources of confusion.

Children with hypokalemia are toxic, irritable, and present with generalized acute flaccid paralysis of all 4 limbs and neck flop, caused by diminished serum potassium levels especially due to diarrhea and vomiting. Weakness is noticed first in limb muscles, followed by weakness in trunk and respiratory muscles. Parents often bring their children in when the child becomes floppy and sudden neck flop is noted. Areflexia, paralysis, death from respiratory muscle failure and cardiac arrest can occur. Intravenous potassium drip save lives when the alert clinician recognizes this condition.

Children with non–specific toxic synovitis present with unilateral limp. Hip or knee joints are commonly affected. There is usually swelling of the joint and movements are painful. Low-grade fever may persist for several days. X–rays may show fluid in the joint space. 
Acute osteomyelitis shows localized signs of inflammation of the affected bone. There is polymorphonuclear leukocytosis. X–rays are diagnostically helpful.

Vitamin C deficiency (Scurvy) may occur at any age, but the majority of cases occurs between 6 months to 2 years of age (like polio). The onset of symptoms is gradual. There is a history of irritability, digestive disorders, and loss of appetite. There is generalized tenderness and child resents handling. Pain leads to pseudo paralysis and the legs are kept in the "frog" position. In some cases subperiosteal hemorrhage may be palpated at distal end of femur. Gums show bluish–purple spongy swelling of mucous membranes, especially when teeth have erupted. X–ray of the knees is diagnostic. In early cases a white line is visible at the distal end of the femur and the proximal end of tibia and fibula. In advanced cases a zone of destruction on the medial side of the distal end of the femur and proximal end of the tibia is seen.

In acute rheumatic fever the clinical pattern is usually diagnostic. The arthritis is migratory and affects different joints, i.e. elbows, knees, ankles, and wrists. The affected joints are red, warm and swollen.

Congenital syphilitic osteomyelitis is found only in early infancy. X–rays are diagnostic and include osteochondritis at wrists, elbows, ankles, knees, and periostitis of the long bones. Osteochondritis is painful and refusal to move the limb leads to pseudoparalysis.

Other conditions such as meningitis or meningoencephalitis can initially be confused with paralytic poliomyelitis; however, their etiologies are clarified after diagnostic procedures, such as lumbar puncture and biochemistry’s.

Post polio syndrome (also called postpolio residual paralysis and postpolio muscular atrophy) refers to a group of disorders experienced by many poliomyelitis sufferers, typically starting 25–35 years after initial onset. Symptoms include renewed, usually gradual progression of muscle weakness, increased fatigability, joint pain, muscle cramps, intolerance to cold, and sometimes increased difficulty in breathing (when respiratory muscles are involved or severe scoliosis is present). Postpolio syndrome appears to be more frequent and severe in persons who had a more severe initial poliomyelitis illness. No single examination, procedure, or laboratory test can definitely diagnose this condition. There is no evidence to suggest that these patients be re-infected or have chronic infection; rather, they may be experiencing the consequences of long–term overuse or disuse to compensate for the original destruction of nerve cells.



Clinical Management of Poliomyelitis Go To Top
 

Management of paralytic poliomyelitis in the acute phase is symptomatic. The child needs rest and care to ensure that there is no stress on the affected muscles. Care is also required to see that the child does not get secondary infections. Massage and injections during this period are contraindicated.

Uncomplicated cases of single lower limb or both lower limbs and trunk involvement can be treated at home. However, if poliomyelitis is suspected, such children should be examined by a physician as early as possible, to confirm diagnosis, rule out "high–risk" factors, such as early respiratory involvement, and for proper advice to parents on the care of the child at home.

Treatment of the Acute Phase of Paralytic Poliomyelitis
Complete bed rest.
Correct positioning of affected limb(s).
Passive movements of the joints.
Warm water compress.
Symptomatic treatment for fever and pain.
No massage or intramuscular injections.
Report immediately any progression of paralysis.

Complete bed rest is essential during the acute phase. There should not be any stress on the muscles involved. The mother or other persons caring for the child should frequently change the posture of the child in bed every two to three hours. The child should be placed on the stomach for short periods each day, to avoid the risk of pneumonia.

The limb should be place in the optimum position for relaxation of the paralyzed muscles. The affected limbs can be positioned with pillows or rolled towels. The recommended positions are hip–slight flexion; knee – 5 degrees flexion; foot – 90 degrees (support against the sole of the foot). Both legs should be supported from the lateral sides with pillows or rolled towels to prevent external rotation. Rolled towels should also be place under the knee for positioning of hips and knees.

Joints of paralyzed muscles should be moved passively gently through full range of motion to prevent contracture. Such movements should be done for 10 minutes 2 to 3 times a day. The movements should involve all joints of the affected limb. The movement should be within the range of pain.
Warm water compress using hot packs with soaked towels wrapped around the affected parts for 10 minutes 2 to 3 times daily should be started as soon as possible and continued up to 6 weeks after onset of paralysis.

There is no restriction on diet and normal food may be given to the child. Children may be constipated during this period. Transient urine retention may be noted which alternate hot may relieve and cold compressed over the suprapubic region. However, if constipation lasts for 3 days or if there is no unit for 24 hours, such children should be immediately taken to a hospital.

In 2 to 20% of the cases the outcome may be fatal due to involvement of muscles affecting vital functions, especially respiration. If the child shows any respiratory distress; if the paralysis is rapidly progressing and if the upper limbs are involved in the first week of illness, the child should preferably be hospitalized. Indications for referral to the hospital are listed below.

Indications for Hospitalization
Progression of paralysis.
Respiratory distress.
Difficulty swallowing, eating and speaking
Paralysis of upper limbs of < 3 days.
Marked drowsiness.
Other complications.


As the acute phase of illness subsides and recovery of strength begins, the emphasis shifts to active rather than passive movements and a vigorous program of physical therapy is initiated to regain muscle power. Management of the recovery phase begins with a careful assessment and recording of muscle power of the weak muscle groups to serve as a baseline. The degree of recovery ranges from minimal to complete. Maximum recovery of the affected muscles takes place in the first six months, but slow recovery continues up to two years. Physical therapy is necessary to prevent deformities and contracture due to muscle imbalance or improper posture. Physical therapy under a qualified physiotherapist is important for regaining muscle power and rehabilitation of the child.

Braces are used to compensate for weak muscle groups, e.g. foot drop or more severe leg weakness. Children are fitted with braces (calipers) depending upon the age and degree of involvement of the limbs. Unilateral brace is given in case of a single lower limb paralysis by the age of one and a half years, when the child begins to start walking. Bilateral leg braces are prescribed for both leg paralysis by the age of 2 1/2 to 3 years of age. Children with bilateral braces need crutches. Bracing above or below the knee depends on the extent of paralysis. It can be extended up to the trunk in the case of trunk muscle weakness. Infants and younger children are also given abdominal support and jackets to help in sitting in case of trunk weakness.

Although further clinical recovery is not expected after two years, continued physiotherapy is required to prevent deformities. Contracture, denervation, or imbalance of muscle tension can lead to progressive skeletal deformities. Reduced growth of a denervated extremity is commonly seen. Tendon shortening can be largely prevented by active physical therapy in the weeks following acute poliomyelitis, but some cases will require orthopedic procedures. Tendon transplants may be considered to improve function of the hand or foot. Surgical interventions may be indicated for various forms of deformities. Orthotic appliances also need to be changed as the child grows.

Except for physical handicap of residual paralysis, children are otherwise normal and should be treated as such. They should be encouraged to take part in childhood activities and attend normal schools. The guidance of a pediatric physiatrist, occupational therapist, social worker, and a vocational counselor are helpful in promoting a positive approach and adjustment.


Go To Top Go To Top
 
Copyright © 2005 Programme for Immunization Preventable Diseases (IPD). All Rights Reserved